Comentários (2)

1. I am surfing this post and thinking of it’s theme and trying to know what is this post concerning. buy vigrx plus

2. I was pondering your Beatpaths sytesm (which I really like, in case my occasional critiques obscures), and I think I have honed in on what I think is its primary limitation its nature puts undue significance on in-conference, out-of-division games. Since a team plays each divisional opponent twice, and every division-mate shares games against the same out-of-conference foes, these games provide a bevy of opportunities for beatloops and the resulting ambiguities.Conversely, in-conference/out-of-division games are not generally shared by many in-division foes, and as such they more frequently result in beatpaths that have few opportunities to be eradicated.Looking at the current graphic, and only at the direct arrows rather than those downpath’, here is what I see:Denver: three outbound arrows; two to in-conference, out-of-division teams (ICOODT).Washington: one outbound arrow, to an ICOODT.Indy: two outbound arrows, both to ICOODT.Seattle: two outbound arrows, both to ICOODT.Jax: two outbound arrows, both to ICOODT.NE: two outbound arrows, one to ICOODT.Dallas: one outbound arrow, to an ICOODT.Pit: three outbound arrows, one to an ICOODT.TB: two outbound arrows, one to an ICOODT.Car: one outbound arrow, to an ICOODT.Chi: one outbound arrow, not to an ICOODT.Atl: one outbound arrow, to an ICOODT.Min: two outbound arrows, one to an ICOODT.Cin: two outbound arrows, neither to an ICOODT.Det: two outbound arrows, one to an ICOODT.NYG: three outbound arrows, one to an ICOODT.Cle: Two outbound arrows, one to an ICOODT.Bal: three outbound arrows, two to ICOODT.KC: Two outbound arrows, both to ICOODT.SD: Three outbound arrows, two to ICOODT.Ari: One outbound arrow, not to an ICOODT.Phi: One outbound arrow, to an ICOODT.Mia: One outbound arrow, to an ICOODT.SF: One outbound arrow, not to an ICOODT.Buf: One outbound arrow, to an ICOODT.Oak: One outbound arrow, not to an ICOODT.Stl: Two outbound arrows, one to an ICOODT.Ten: One outbound arrow, not to an ICOODT.There are 49 arrows on the most recent chart. Of these, 27 are linking directly in-conference/out-of-division opponents 55% of the arrows. That seems very, very high to me. Losing an ICOODT game to a team you should not would have a very high cost that you would not likely be able to shake, while winning one would prop you up when you probably shouldn’t. The reason is because Buffalo’s win caused Chicago to lose their beatpath to Carolina, which was a huge part of their ranking. Meanwhile, Minnesota still has their beatpath to the Giants. A huge part of Chicago’s ranking was due to a win over an ICOODT. They lost it, but the opportunities to lose such a beatpath are fewer than the opportunities to lose an in-division or an out-of-conference beatpath. Meanwhile Minnesota is still enjoying their win over the ICOODT the Giants and there have not been many ways (although there have been ways) for them to lose that Beatpath over the past few weeks.